11 Comments

Did you even read the ruling?

Expand full comment

I'd like to see the courts act much faster and keep things simple.

Court: Everyone, we're using the K.I.S.S. method in court today. Counsel, you each have thirty seconds for opening statements to make your case and show me which statute you're charging, then Prosecution you'll have two minutes per witness, Defense gets three. Maximum of three witnesses per side. This case will be tried and verdict rendered TODAY, understood?

When any judge gets overturned on appeal more than twice, he/she/xi is removed from the bench.

Keep the dockets clear so decisions (and justice) are timely and concise.

Expand full comment

Yes, it will certainly put a large pin in their collective balloon should they wish to trample on everybody's rights again.

Expand full comment

The likelyhood of this biting Trpudeau in the nether regions is remote if we are to sit and wait for the SCC to rule. That's assuming they will accept this to rule on. However, Freelander will be pushing because it is such a black eye for anyone in caucus, including her. Lametti saw the writing and did the dishonorable thing and quit.

Expand full comment

Freelandrescher has demonstrated that there are hills even she refuses to die on. She needs to take a good hard serious look at how her boss reacts to outcomes such as this one. He has consistently demonstrated that even the welfare of his wife and kids means nothing to him. Now she needs to ask herself: how long does she think she's going to be able to hold out before he decides to throw her in front of the speeding train to save his own arse? Because sooner or later, she's going to be his chosen scapegoat.

Expand full comment